How can you recognize an unreliable source in reading comprehension?

How can you recognize an unreliable source in reading comprehension?

• A. By looking for emotional language only
• B. By checking for bias, lack of evidence, or sensationalism
• C. By verifying the popularity of the source
• D. By checking the publication date only

Answer: (B)

Recognizing an unreliable source is crucial in reading comprehension, and one of the key indicators is the presence of bias, lack of evidence, or sensationalism. These factors significantly undermine the credibility of the information presented. When a source exhibits bias, it means that the information is being tailored to fit a particular agenda or viewpoint rather than presenting facts objectively. This can lead to a skewed interpretation of events or issues. The absence of evidence in a source also casts doubt on its reliability. Credible sources typically support their claims with data, research, or references, so when these elements are missing, it raises questions about the validity of the information. Sensationalism refers to the use of exaggerated, shocking, or emotionally charged language to grab attention, often at the expense of accurate reporting. This approach can distort the truth and lead readers to form opinions based on misleading information. The other options do not offer a comprehensive method for assessing the reliability of a source. Emotional language can be a factor, but relying solely on that does not provide a full picture of reliability. Popularity can be misleading, as well-known sources can still be biased or inaccurate. Lastly, checking the publication date is important for relevancy but does not necessarily indicate reliability. Therefore, evaluating for

Recognizing an unreliable source is crucial in reading comprehension, and one of the key indicators is the presence of bias, lack of evidence, or sensationalism. These factors significantly undermine the credibility of the information presented. When a source exhibits bias, it means that the information is being tailored to fit a particular agenda or viewpoint rather than presenting facts objectively. This can lead to a skewed interpretation of events or issues.

The absence of evidence in a source also casts doubt on its reliability. Credible sources typically support their claims with data, research, or references, so when these elements are missing, it raises questions about the validity of the information. Sensationalism refers to the use of exaggerated, shocking, or emotionally charged language to grab attention, often at the expense of accurate reporting. This approach can distort the truth and lead readers to form opinions based on misleading information.

The other options do not offer a comprehensive method for assessing the reliability of a source. Emotional language can be a factor, but relying solely on that does not provide a full picture of reliability. Popularity can be misleading, as well-known sources can still be biased or inaccurate. Lastly, checking the publication date is important for relevancy but does not necessarily indicate reliability. Therefore, evaluating for